New Research Confirms ESG Controversies Increase Company Risk — Here’s What Investors Should Know

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have moved from the periphery to the core of investment and risk management discussions. While positive ESG actions are often linked to better financial stability, new research from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology reveals the flip side: ESG controversies significantly increase a company’s exposure to systemic risk.

Published in Finance Research Letters (2025), the study "Environmental, Social and Governance Controversies and Systematic Risk: A Machine Learning Approach" sheds new light on the complex relationship between ESG controversies and firm-level risk, using advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to provide unprecedented insights.

What the Study Examined

The researchers analyzed 463 non-financial companies listed in the STOXX Europe 600 index between 2016 and 2022. Their objective was to assess whether ESG controversies, such as environmental violations, social misconduct, or governance failures, impact a company’s systematic risk, measured by its beta coefficient (a key risk indicator in finance).

Importantly, the study leveraged a Random Forest machine learning model combined with Explainable AI (XAI) methods to predict and interpret firm-level risk.

Key Finding: ESG Controversies Increase Systematic Risk

The study's core conclusion is clear: ESG controversies significantly raise a firm’s systematic risk. In other words, when a company is embroiled in environmental scandals, social misconduct, or governance failures, investors perceive it as riskier, leading to greater stock volatility and sensitivity to market shocks.

Not All Controversies Are Equal

As Responsible Investor has reported, some investors have already voiced their concerns.

Sondre Myge, head of ESG at Skagen Funds, said that while it’s still early, his “first impression is that it complicates comparability. Investors are now drowning in a mix of voluntary and legal disclosures requiring them to make assessments through a kaleidoscope of standards and methodologies. Sifting critically through hundreds of pages of text just for one company is a huge undertaking. While first movers will provide glossy reports that convey a convincing impression, it is important to remember that disclosures are not necessarily representative.”

Jan Kaeraa Rasmussen, head of ESG and sustainability at PensionDanmark, agreed, stating that initial disclosures tend to be “more narrative than quantitative. This limits our ability to draw robust, forward-looking insights from the information provided.”

What’s Next: Simplification or More Complexity?

Interestingly, the study found that the relationship between ESG controversies and risk is non-linear:

• • • Firms experiencing their first ESG controversy ("first-timers") see a pronounced jump in risk.
    • For firms regularly facing controversies ("regulars"), the effect on risk remains high but stabilizes.
    • Small controversies matter most for firms with otherwise clean records. For already controversial
    • firms, additional issues have less incremental impact.
      

This pattern aligns with investor behavior: markets tend to overreact to initial controversies while becoming desensitized to repeated issues.

Machine Learning: A Powerful Risk Prediction Tool

The researchers used Random Forest regression, a machine learning technique that captures complex, non-linear relationships in data, to predict systematic risk.

Compared to traditional models, the Random Forest approach reduced the prediction error by nearly 30%. The model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.25 for 2022 risk predictions, outperforming a naïve benchmark model that assigned every company the same average risk.

This reinforces the value of machine learning in financial risk management — particularly when assessing non-traditional factors like ESG controversies.

Industry Matters: Some Sectors Are More Vulnerable

The study also highlights that the impact of ESG controversies on risk is highly sector-specific.

Industries with Highest Sensitivity to ESG Controversies:

• • • Machinery
    • Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
    • Chemicals
    • Metals & Mining
    • Professional Services
      

These industries tend to face greater investor scrutiny due to their environmental footprint or governance challenges.

Industries with Lowest Sensitivity:

• • • Real Estate
    • Food Products
    • Electric Utilities

Geographic Differences in Risk

In addition to industry effects, the research found that firms in certain countries face higher systematic risk linked to ESG controversies.

Countries with the highest predicted systematic risk included:

• • • Finland
    • Portugal
    • Poland
    • Netherlands
    • Sweden

Meanwhile, firms in Italy and Germany showed lower ESG-related risk exposure.

Implications for Investors, Risk Managers, and Companies

This study provides clear takeaways for finance professionals and ESG practitioners:

1. 1. ESG Controversy Monitoring Is Critical
      Investors need advanced ESG monitoring tools to detect early signs of controversy, particularly for first-time incidents, which have the highest risk impact.
   2. Tailor Risk Management to Industry
      Risk managers should take into account industry-specific vulnerabilities.
   3. Machine Learning Enhances Risk Prediction
      Traditional risk models may overlook non-linear ESG effects. Machine learning offers a powerful, data-driven approach to anticipate market reactions to ESG incidents.
   4. Proactive ESG Management Reduces Risk
      Companies should address ESG risks early before they escalate into high-profile controversies that damage reputation and investor trust.
      

Conclusion

This groundbreaking research bridges ESG and AI, demonstrating that ESG controversies are not just a reputational issue; they are a quantifiable financial risk. Machine learning models provide finance professionals with more accurate tools to assess and mitigate this risk.

About SESAMm

Discover SESAMm provides AI-powered solutions to help investors and companies identify ESG controversies and risks before they escalate. Using state-of-the-art AI, SESAMm analyzes millions of sources in near real-time, detecting ESG controversies across public and private companies worldwide. Whether for due diligence, portfolio monitoring, or supplier risk management, SESAMm enables financial professionals to stay ahead of emerging risks and make more informed decisions.
Learn more at www.sesamm.com.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.